Search This Blog

Monday, January 1, 2018

TIME & PLACE (blogging Genesis)

Blogging Genesis 35:27 – 36:43



Genesis 35: 27 Then Jacob came to his father Isaac at Mamre, or Kirjath Arba (that is, Hebron), where Abraham and Isaac had dwelt.
28 Now the days of Isaac were one hundred and eighty years.
 29 So Isaac breathed his last and died, and was gathered to his people, being old and full of days.
And his sons Esau and Jacob buried him.

Time (and geography) has a way of changing your perspective: your personal perspective and our historical perspective.

On a personal level, look at Jacob and Esau.  They were rivals from the womb.  Literally.  But, when their father died, they reconciled and, for a while, even moved their clans together to live on the same land.  However, as had happened with their Grandpa Abraham and Great-Uncle Lot, the brothers’ respective success and the growth of their extended families forced them to split up and look for more land.

Then Esau took his wives, his sons, his daughters, and all the persons of his household, his cattle and all his animals, and all his goods which he had gained in the land of Canaan, and went to a country away from the presence of his brother Jacob.  For their possessions were too great for them to dwell together, and the land where they were strangers could not support them because of their livestock (Genesis 36:6-7).

Time and geography turned the sibling rivals into friends and, for a time, co-heads of their households.   

Time and place have an equally profound effect when you move from the personal to the historical,

Genesis chapter 36 is a genealogy of Esau’s descendants covering several generations well into the next couple hundred years in Canaan.

A history may cover hundreds of years across a region spanning thousands of miles, but it is written in a single place from the perspective of a single historical moment.  The time and place of the scholar skews the perspective and the conclusions of their history.

15 These were the chiefs of the sons of Esau. The sons of Eliphaz, the firstborn son of Esau, were Chief Teman, Chief Omar, Chief Zepho, Chief Kenaz,
16 Chief Korah, Chief Gatam, and Chief Amalek.  These were the chiefs of Eliphaz in the land of Edom. They were the sons of Adah.
. . . 31 Now these were the kings who reigned in the land of Edom before any king reigned over the children of Israel:  (Genesis 36: 15, 16-31)

Genesis 36 says that Esaus’ descendants became tribal chiefs and eventually kings in Canaan.   Meanwhile his brother’s family relocated to Egypt where their descendants were enslaved and kept in bondage for 400 years.

Imagine if the history of the two sons of Isaac been written by a Canaanite observer living in the time between the end of Genesis and the beginning of Exodus. 

Esau would have been the successful twin.  His offspring, the Edomites, would have been the chosen people, the “superior” nation and some clever historian, looking “objectively” at the historical evidence would have pointed out that the Israelites were descendants of a Jacob the usurper, a known liar.  Therefore, this hypothetical scholar might have argued, the Israelites were a cursed race, genetically predisposed to service, fit only for second-class citizenship, unlike the noble Edomites.
But if you let history run a few more centuries, Israel becomes a great kingdom, Edom is wiped out, and the greatest religion in the world (I’m not even pretending to be objective about that) is literally born from the descendants of Israel.    Now who’s the cursed and who’s the chosen?

Five hundred years ago Africans were colonized and enslaved by Europeans.  Today, the African continent is stereotypically synonymous with famine, poverty, AIDS, and political chaos.  From this history, generations of Eurocentric scholars have concluded that African people and their descendants are cursed, inferior, and genetically suited to slavery and second-class citizenship. 


But imagine if the history had been written by a Spanish observer between 700 and 1492 A.D.  The medieval Spanish historian would have known Africans as Moors, the conquerors and rulers of Spain.  The Moors essentially ended the Dark Ages in Europe by introducing such innovations as personal hygiene (like deodorant and regular bathing), universal education, street lighting, hydraulic engineering, advanced agriculture, the first paper-making factory, and algebra.  A medieval Spanish historian writing in a new library built at the height of the Moorish era might have called Europeans filthy savages who should be grateful that their Black-skinned masters had colonized their backwards land and brought them civilization. 


History is the big picture, but depending on which years, which locations, and which events you crop out of the picture ---- the remaining image can make any group of people look way too good or way too bad.

The valid lessons of history teach us about contexts not character.   History doesn’t define certain nations or ethnicities as always good or always evil.  History can only tell us who did what in a given time and place.  In any given time and any given place, the right conditions can push any given people to become either heroes or villains.  The predictive parts of the historical record are the contexts and conditions. 

The Bible is a book for all times and all places.  How can such a relatively small anthology apply universally?  Because God in His infinite wisdom filled Scripture with stories of the contexts and conditions that make a people kings followed by the contexts and conditions that make that same people extinct.  The Bible shows us a people united and that same people divided.  It breaks down how a free community finds itself enslaved and how an enslaved people gets free.   Scripture lays out the contexts that make for great national leaders and the conditions that promote tyranny, corruption, and apostasy. 

Through Scripture, God teaches us to talk less about the TIMES in which we live
Do not say, “Why were the former days better than these?”  For you do not inquire wisely concerning this (Ecclesiastes 7:10)

God teaches us to not to define ourselves by our geographical boundaries and national affiliations.

And do not think to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I say to you that God is able to raise up children to Abraham from these stones (Matthew 3:9).

Therefore understand that the Lord your God is not giving you this good land to possess because of your righteousness, for you are a stiff-necked people (Deuteronomy 9:6)

Times and places change.  Our actions create the conditions of our time and place and those conditions define how chosen or how cursed our history will be. 

--Anderson T. Graves II   is a writer, community organizer and consultant for education, ministry, and rural leadership development.

Rev. Anderson T. Graves II is pastor of Miles Chapel CME Church in Fairfield, Alabama. He writes a blog called A Word to the Wise at www.andersontgraves.blogspot.com

Email atgravestwo2@aol.com
Follow me on twitter @AndersonTGraves 

Click here to support this ministry with a donation.  Or go to andersontgraves.blogspot.com and click on the DONATE button on the right-hand sidebar.

Support by check or money order may be mailed to 
Miles Chapel CME Church
P O Box 132
Fairfield, Al 35064

No comments:

Post a Comment