Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Dinah. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dinah. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 7, 2018

JUSTICE FOR BOTH: Lessons from Dinah & Joseph


Blogging Genesis 34 & 39

In the first book of the Bible, God directly addresses sexual assault in the community of faith.  Under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, the author of Genesis recorded the stories of a sister and her brother who were separately victims of the two extremes of injustice in sexual assault cases.  Their names were Dinah and Joseph and they were children of the man God named Israel.

Genesis 34 tells Dinah’s story.  She was raped, and the justice system of village fathers did nothing.  Nothing to give the girl justice.   But the powerful men, including Dinah’s father,  who controlled the system did much to protect and legitimize Dinah’s attacker because he was the son of a rich and powerful man. (http://andersontgraves.blogspot.com/2017/12/dinahs-story-sexual-assault-of-israels.html )


Genesis 39 tells how Dinah’s brother Joseph was sexually harassed by his master’s wife.  Being an honorable man, Joseph resisted and refused the rich and privileged woman’s advances.  Being a slave, his honor was of little concern to his master’s wife. One day, when the big house was empty, she physically assaulted Joseph.  She ripped off his clothes and tried to rape him but Joseph escaped.  Well, not really.

Joseph’s assailant accused him of trying to rape her, and the Egyptian justice system did nothing.  Nothing to discover the truth.  Potiphar, Joseph’s master exercised the authority of judge and jury over Joseph, and with that authority he sent Joseph to federal prison for a crime he didn’t commit. 

By linking these stories to siblings in the holy family of the Old Testament, God challenges the church to answer how we can order our response to accusations of sexual assault so that we don’t commit the injustice of Dinah or the injustice of Joseph. 


In answer to God's challenge, I propose 6 principles:
1. First, call the cops or whatever legal authority applies.
Christians are commanded to consider ourselves and admit our weaknesses.  We must admit that no church is properly equipped to handle sexual crime in-house.

If a matter arises which is too hard for you to judge, between degrees of guilt for bloodshed, between one judgment or another, or between one punishment or another, matters of controversy within your gates, then you shall arise and go up to the place which the Lord your God chooses (Deuteronomy 17:8 )
God has chosen to raise up and allow secular authority.  Every officer of the court is human and imperfect, but “he is God’s minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God’s minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil” (Romans 13:1-4).

Church leaders should consider themselves mandatory reporters of abuse whether the abuse is alleged to involve children or only adults.

2.  Protect the weak instead of “protect your own.”
For many reasons, even when the authorites have been notified, the church may still have to  conduct an internal investigation.  When that happens, church leaders must resist the impulse to shield those most like us from scrutiny while  exposing the “other” to attack.

Instead we should follow the Biblical principle of protecting which ever party is less powerful. 

Defend the poor and fatherless;
Do justice to the afflicted and needy.
Deliver the poor and needy;
Free them from the hand of the wicked. (Psalm 82:3-4)

Now don’t confuse protecting those with less power with protecting those with the most to lose.  Potiphar’s wife had farther to fall, but Joseph had less power.  A deacon accused of a sexual crime may risk more status than the anonymous girl making the accusation, but the anonymous girl is more vulnerable to intimidation, coercion, and mob justice.  So, we who are strong, must give her the security necessary to complete the process safely and fairly.  This doesn’t mean we decide whom to believe.  It means we decide whom to shield  Protecting the weak from the strong doesn’t mean believing the weak over the strong.   The first answer is to level the field so that the weaker party has the same security and freedom to make their case. 

By this principle, in Genesis 34, we would have given extra care and security to  Dinah, an unmarried woman in a patriarchal culture.  In Genesis 39, we would shield Joseph, a foreign slave in an aristocratic Egyptian household. 

3.  Give both parties equal voice.   
Joseph speaks often in Genesis 39 --- until he’s accused of rape.  From then (Genesis 39:14) until the next chapter, Joseph says nothing.  Chapter 34 is about what happened to Dinah, but she has no lines of dialogue in the entire drama.  The church should not shush either side of the case. 


You shall not show partiality in judgment; you shall hear the small as well as the great; you shall not be afraid in any man’s presence, for the judgment is God’s (Deuteronomy 1:17).

By this standard, we would have given Dinah’s  and Joseph’s words equal space in the record.

4.  Don’t equate class with credibility.
In Genesis 34 & 39 began when the judges closed rank the party who most represented “us” (wealthy man like “us”; free Egyptian like “us”). 

You shall do no injustice in judgment. You shall not be partial to the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty. In righteousness you shall judge your neighbor. (Leviticus 19:15)

The church will have to discern truth from fabrication, but we must never look at their appearance or their past and say, “You can’t believe someone like THAT.” 

5.  Keep justice free and unafraid.
Father Israel failed his daughter because he was afraid of becoming “obnoxious among the inhabitants of the land . . . since I am few in number, they will gather themselves together against me and kill me. I shall be destroyed, my household and I” (Genesis 34:30).  He wanted to save his hide and his business. 

Mrs. Potiphar invoked racial fear as if it were evidence of wrongdoing. “She called to the men of her house and spoke to them, saying, ‘See, he has brought in to us a Hebrew to mock us.’ ” (Genesis 34:14).


The truth may cost a church in donations, membership, and standing in the community.  Justice may make us “obnoxious among the inhabitants of the land” and open us to further claims of liability by those who “gather themselves together against” us.   A “little” cover-up can be tempting. 

It’s tempting to structure the process to favor whomever can get more donations to their legal fund.  A few fees for administrative costs, a choice of venue far away and expensive, a hearing schedule that requires somebody take days off from a job and someone may have to drop their case.


God says: You shall not pervert justice; you shall not show partiality, nor take a bribe, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and twists the words of the righteous (Deuteronomy 16:19)

A free and unafraid church would’ve heard Dinah’s attacker confess to the crime and then turned him over to the police.  A free and unafraid church would have heard Joseph’s testimony and investigated the whole story.

6.  Tell the truth and shame the devil. 
Satan, the enemy of the church, rejoices when we mishandle sexual crimes.  No matter what the final outcome, the very fact of an allegation means that something bad has happened.   Nothing short of time travel will undo that bad thing that happened in the church.   

The truth starts the process of Christ’s healing.  Anything other than the truth hands the process over to Satan to use to steal, kill, and destroy the church from the inside. 

Don’t give our enemy the chance.

These are the things you shall do: Speak each man the truth to his neighbor; Give judgment in your gates for truth, justice, and peace (Zechariah 8:16).


--Anderson T. Graves II   is a writer, community organizer and consultant for education, ministry, and rural leadership development.

Rev. Anderson T. Graves II is pastor of Miles Chapel CME Church in Fairfield, Alabama. He writes a blog called A Word to the Wise at www.andersontgraves.blogspot.com

Email atgravestwo2@aol.com
Follow me on twitter @AndersonTGraves 

Click here to support this ministry with a donation.  Or go to andersontgraves.blogspot.com and click on the DONATE button on the right-hand sidebar.

Support by check or money order may be mailed to 
Miles Chapel CME Church
P O Box 132
Fairfield, Al 35064




Monday, December 4, 2017

DINAH'S STORY: THE SEXUAL ASSAULT OF ISRAEL'S DAUGHTER

blogging Genesis 34.

Israel, aka Jacob, had 12 sons, but he only had 1 daughter.  Her name was Dinah.  
She was raped.

Israel had settled his family on land he bought near the Canaanite city of Shechem (Genesis 33:19).  At this point in history, the house of Israel wasn’t on a campaign to dispossess the Canaanites, and God had not commanded them to separate themselves from Canaanite communities.  Israel (the man and the family) were free to cultivate close business and personal relationships with the Canaanites,  which is why it was neither sinful, unwise, or unusual for Dinah, Israel’s only daughter, to go visit Caananite girl-friends in the city (Genesis 34:1)

"Now Dinah the daughter of Leah, whom she had borne to Jacob, went out to see the daughters of the land." (Genesis 34:1)

On one of those visits to Shechem, Hamor noticed Dinah.  Hamor was the richest young man in the city that was named after his family.  He was known as the “prince of the country” and he wanted Dinah.



The Bible says he “saw her, he took her and lay with her, and violated her” (Genesis 34:2, NKJV).  

The KJV says “he took her, and lay with her, and defiled her.” The NASB translates “he took her and lay with her by force.”  The NIV says “he took her and raped her.”

The Hebrew verb being used is anah which means to afflict, to force into humility, to abase, to impose one’s will upon.  Hamor did to Dinah what Hamor wanted to do and he did it WITHOUT DINAH’S CONSENT.   He abducted and raped her.

Genesis 34:7 calls what Hamor did to Dinah “a disgraceful thing in Israel. . . , a thing which ought not to be done.”  In other words, it was NOT O.K. 

After his crime, Hamor tried to be charming.  He tried to convince Dinah that she had wanted it, too.  He even asked his father to arrange marriage between them.  That was verses 3 and 4.  Verse 7 says what Hamor did to Dinah was “a disgraceful thing in Israel. . . , a thing which ought not to be done.”  It was still not O.K.

The Bible is essential not comprehensive.  Scripture doesn’t provide comprehensive details of all or of any historical events in the Old Testmament and New Testament timelines.  I’m not on a tangent; follow me on this.  Through scripture, God retells the events, ideas, and details that are essential for knowing God and living in right relationship with Him.  Most historical events don’t make it into the Biblical record.  Those that do, like Dinah’s rape, are case studies from which we can extrapolate lessons about God and humanity which transcend culture, time, and geography.

So, the details missing from the case of sexual assault in Dinah vs. Hamor are details which the Holy Spirit has ruled are non-essential.

We don’t know what Dinah was wearing when she visited her friends in Shechem because God’s saying it doesn’t matter what she was wearing.   We don’t know if Dinah had been drinking.  God’s saying that doesn’t matter.  How’d she end up alone with Hamor?  Did she try to fight?  Why didn’t she fight harder?  Why didn’t she yell for help or yell louder?  There’s no way to know or derive those answer from the information in the Bible because IT DOESN’T MATTER.

What does matter is:  Hamor took Dinah and lay without her consent.    He raped her. 

Christians claim spiritual (not necessarily biological) descent from Abraham.   “Know then that it is those of faith who are the sons of Abraham” (Galatians 3:7).  So Old Testament Israel is a metaphor for the church.  Dinah is the daughter of Israel, and she represents the daughters of the church.   Israel's response to Dinah speaks to the church's response to women in our congregations, our spiritual daughters.

So how did Israel handle Dinah’s sexual assault?  Typically. Which is to say BADLY.

Misstep 1.  Control the damage instead of comfort the victim. 

When Jacob/ Israel found out, his first act was to limit access to information to prevent negative publicity.  “And Jacob heard that he had defiled Dinah his daughter. Now his sons were with his livestock in the field; so Jacob held his peace until they came out” (Genesis 34:5).


Misstep 2.  Negotiation instead of investigation.    

In verses 6-9, Hamor and Shechem have the actual audacity to show up at Dinah’s home say, “Ask me ever so much dowry and gift, and I will give according to what you say to me; but give me the young woman as a wife.”  As his wife in those times, Dinah wouldn’t be able to claim he’d dishonored her.    

Israel participated in what was the Bronze Age equivalent of offering a monetary settlement to the company in exchange for the victim signing a nondisclosure agreement.
  

Misstep 3.  Vaccum of injustice.  Israel did not appropriately handle these very serious allegations.  He tried to silence the complaint before it damaged his business relationships.   Where there should have been justice there was ----- nothing.  Nature abhors a vacuum.  God abhors a vacuum of injustice. 
You shall not pervert justice; you shall not show partiality, nor take a bribe, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and twists the words of the righteous.  (Deuteronomy 16: 19)

He who justifies the wicked, and he who condemns the just, both of them alike are an abomination to the Lord. (Proverbs 17: 15)

It’s easy to calculate a response when the perpetrator is an addict, a vagrant, or a certified sex-offender.  But what about when the predator is a prince, and he’s charming, and he speaks sweetly, and he’s from a good family, and we have important business with them? 

What happens to Dinah’s allegations when they implicate someone we like?


A vacuum of injustice  will be filled with VENGEANCE.  Organized, public, loud, costly vengeance. 

Misstep 4.  Division of the house.  Dinah’s brothers pretended to go along with the old, rich men’s  plan for settlement and damage control.  

“The sons of Jacob answered Shechem and Hamor his father, and spoke deceitfully, because he had defiled Dinah their sister. And they said to them, “. . . On this condition we will consent to you: If you will become as we are, if every male of you is circumcised” (Genesis 34: 13-16).

But  the militant young brothers in the (church) family had plans of their own.  

“Now it came to pass on the third day, when they were in pain, that two of the sons of Jacob, Simeon and Levi, Dinah’s brothers, each took his sword and came boldly upon the city and killed all the males. And they killed Hamor and Shechem . . . and took Dinah from Shechem’s house, . . . and plundered the city” (Genesis 34:25-28).

Organized, public, loud, costly vengeance. 

Israel rebuked them.  The old head(s) of the family   Israel argued that their extreme, public actions would upset the dominant majority and make trouble for their good, law-abiding community. 

Then Jacob said to Simeon and Levi, “You have troubled me by making me obnoxious among the inhabitants of the land, among the Canaanites and the Perizzites; and since I am few in number, they will gather themselves together against me and kill me. I shall be destroyed, my household and I.” (Genesis 34:30)

The young militant brothers didn’t care (verse 31).

Israel's standing in that community was ruined.  The next chapters detail how they had to close and move.  The whole (church) family entered a season marked by soul-searching, death/decline, and inconsolable grief (Genesis 35).  The relationship between the 2 generations in the house of Israel was damaged beyond repair.  The rest of Genesis is story after story of betrayal, drama, mess, back-stabbing, selling-out, and moral hypocrisy that makes the house so dysfunctional  that all their old leader Israel ever talks about for the rest of the book is dying.

Mess.  Drama.  Cross-generational infighting. Organizational dysfunction.  Hypocrisy.  Loss of moral center.  An obsession with the death of the institution.   Does any of this sound familiar to the church? 

This generation will no longer accept the old missteps.  They won’t settle for silence  just to keep peace.  They demand justice and if that is denied ---- they will fill the vacuum.

So will our spiritual Israel learn from the missteps of the man Israel, or will we repeat them like all our institutions have been doing for all the centuries since Dinah was attacked?

We’ll find out.  And I don’t think it’ll be long before we do.


 For the time has come for judgment to begin at the house of God; and if it begins with us first, what will be the end of those who do not obey the gospel of God?  (1 Peter 4:17)

---Anderson T. Graves II   is a writer, community organizer and consultant for education, ministry, and rural leadership development.

Rev. Anderson T. Graves II is pastor of Miles Chapel CME Church in Fairfield, Alabama;  executive director of the Substance Abuse Youth Networking Organization (SAYNO);  and director of rural leadership development for the National Institute for Human Development (NIHD).

Subscribe to my personal blog  www.andersontgraves.blogspot.com .

Email atgravestwo2@aol.com
Follow me on twitter @AndersonTGraves 

Click here to support this ministry with a donation.  Or go to andersontgraves.blogspot.com and click on the DONATE button on the right-hand sidebar.

Support by check or money order may be mailed to 
Miles Chapel CME Church
P O Box 132
Fairfield, Al 35064



Saturday, April 25, 2015

OUR PROBLEMS, HIS POWER, THE PLAN or LESSONS FROM ISRAEL’S HOOD

The man God named Israel had 12 sons, at least 1 daughter, 3 wives, and 2 baby’s mamas-- give or take.  The Biblical account of the family that became the Jewish nation is not a pretty story; but it is a profoundly and relevantly human story.  In this in-depth message for a Men-to-Men ministry workshop, Pastor Graves provides a contemporary profile of the community that became a nation.

You’ll never forget the children of Israel, and you’ll never think about “the hood” the same .

The title of the message is: OUR PROBLEMS, HIS POWER, THE PLAN or LESSONS FROM ISRAEL’S HOOD.


Listen well.


If you can’t get the audio on your device, visit the main podcast page at http://revandersongraves.podomatic.com/

---Anderson T. Graves II   is a writer, community organizer and consultant for education, ministry, and rural leadership development.

Rev. Anderson T. Graves II is pastor of Miles Chapel CME Church in Fairfield, Alabama;  executive director of the Substance Abuse Youth Networking Organization (SAYNO);  and director of rural leadership development for the National Institute for Human Development (NIHD).

Subscribe to my personal blog  www.andersontgraves.blogspot.com .

Email atgravestwo2@aol.com
Follow me on twitter @AndersonTGraves  #Awordtothewise 

You can help support this ministry with a donation to Miles Chapel CME Church.

You can help support Rev. Graves’ work by visiting his personal blog and clicking the DONATE button on the right-hand sidebar.

Support by check or money order may be mailed to 
Miles Chapel CME Church
P O Box 132

Fairfield, Al 35064