Search This Blog

Showing posts with label argument. Show all posts
Showing posts with label argument. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 4, 2017

WE’LL GET THERE BECAUSE WE AIN’T DRIVING (audio)

Ah, the family road trip.  See the country.  Explore the world together. Ah, the family road trip.  See the country.  Explore the world together.  Get on each others’ nerves and argue every grudge and misunderstanding in your family. 

In the closing verses of Exodus 4, before He returned to Egypt, before He confronted Pharaoh, Moses took his family on a road trip.

It wasn’t pretty.  

The lessons of their misadventure speak an important Word to our church families about how we get to where God wants us to go.  The title of this message in the Exodus series is:  WE’LL GET THERE BECAUSE WE AIN’T DRIVING.

Listen well.

If you can’t get the audio on your device, visit the main podcast page at http://revandersongraves.podomatic.com/

---Anderson T. Graves II   is a writer, community organizer and consultant for education, ministry, and rural leadership development.

Rev. Anderson T. Graves II is pastor of Miles Chapel CME Church in Fairfield, Alabama;  executive director of the Substance Abuse Youth Networking Organization (SAYNO);  and director of rural leadership development for the National Institute for Human Development (NIHD).

Subscribe to my personal blog  www.andersontgraves.blogspot.com .

Email atgravestwo2@aol.com
Follow me on twitter @AndersonTGraves  #Awordtothewise 

You can help support this ministry with a donation to Miles Chapel CME Church.

You can help support Rev. Graves’ work by visiting his personal blog and clicking the DONATE button on the right-hand sidebar.

Support by check or money order may be mailed to 
Miles Chapel CME Church
P O Box 132
Fairfield, Al 35064







Wednesday, October 15, 2014

GOD & THE TOOTH FAIRY



Some people hate religion.  They are vehemently opposed to the very existence of Christianity and other faiths in God or a “god.”   These people maintain that the world and life are the product of chance and evolution.  They reject the idea of a Creator or a Divine plan.

But then.

Then those same people say, as proof of their position, “If there is a God, where was He when…”
… when my child died.
… when my father abandoned us.
… when Hitler murdered millions of Jews.
… when the Twin Towers were attacked.
… when etc., etc.

The atheists reason that if they can show God lacking accountability for tragedy then they can disprove God.

Well, here’s what baffles me: Why don’t they ask, “Where was chance and evolution when…”
Why aren’t they angry at evolution for randomly selecting a child as unfit for survival?
Why aren’t they mad at natural selection for marking entire ethnic groups for genetic extinction?
Where’s the indignation that the steady progress of evolutionary “advancement” created Hitler, who as a later member of the species should have been a better specimen than say Socrates or DaVinci or Isaac Newton?
Why aren’t they mad that “Science” or “Nature” didn’t intervene to facilitate the punctuated evolution of the people in the Twin Towers so that they could survive such a catastrophe?
Why are atheists who say they find religion illogical, so irrationally mad about what they think God did or didn’t do?

When I or my wife get a toothache I don’t demand answers from the tooth fairy because I don’t believe that the tooth fairy exists.   

It’s not simply that I don’t want the tooth fairy to exist.  It’s not that I think the tooth fairy is being mean or unfair so I’m going to say she doesn’t exist because I’m mad at her.  It’s that I really don’t think there’s a tooth fairy. 

I don’t question the fairness or fairy-ness of the tooth fairy because that would be me delusionally arguing with a non-entity.  So why, why do atheists use God’s behavior in their arguments?    

Either there’s something in even the most ardent atheist that makes it impossible not to subconsciously acknowledge God.
Or atheists are delusional.

He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also, he has put eternity into man’s heart, yet so that he cannot find out what God has done from the beginning to the end. (Ecclesiastes 3: 11)

The fool has said in his heart,“There is no God.” (Psalm 14: 1)


Rev. Anderson T. Graves II is pastor of Miles Chapel CME Church in Fairfield, Alabama;  executive director of the Substance Abuse Youth Networking Organization (SAYNO);  and director of rural leadership development for the National Institute for Human Development (NIHD).

Subscribe to my personal blog  www.andersontgraves.blogspot.com .

Email atgravestwo2@aol.com

You can help support this ministry with a donation to Miles Chapel CME Church.

You can help support Rev. Graves’ work by visiting his personal blog and clicking the DONATE button on the right-hand sidebar.

Support by check or money order may be mailed to 
Miles Chapel CME Church
P O Box 132

 Fairfield, Al 35064



Wednesday, February 19, 2014

TRICKY, TRICKY, TRICKY: THE DEBATE OVER MINIMUM WAGE

I love rhetoric, the art of arguing.  The way some people appreciate the arc of smooth jump shot, I notice the flow of well-crafted sarcasm.   I don't always root for the winning team, but I can appreciate the skill they bring to the linguistic field especially when it comes to trick plays.

And I have to give triple props to the Tea Party and their team of conservative players.  They have changed the game of political rhetoric, and I'd like to take a moment and share just 3 of their most clever plays.

One of the simplest and most ingenious tricks of debate is to get your opponent arguing over a single sub-point while you repeat the main point as if it were all ready proven.

Another trick is to constantly change the midpoint (the average between the two sides where compromise is usually found) by restating your position in more and more extreme terms.  It's like raising the bet in poker until the other guy just gives up because the stakes are ridiculously high.

For example,  in the debate over raising minimum wage:  Opponents say that raising minimum wage will cause a loss of jobs.  That's one of many sub-points about the issue.  But, supporters of a higher minimum wage get caught up in trying to empirically disprove this hypothetical argument that cannot be proven or disproven.   Meanwhile conservatives continue to simply state "Minimum wage costs jobs" as though the point  was proven and printed on stone tablets in God's handwriting.
1st Trick.

In the same discussion over raising minimum wage: When supporters propose a $1.75 increase, opponents counter by saying eliminate minimum wage all together.  They change the midpoint and now supporters fall over themselves trying to prove that there should be a minimum wage. They lose focus on why it should be higher.
Trick #2.

It's ingenious.  I really admire the rhetorical savvy of conservative strategists.

They've gotten the other side so discombobulated that they haven't made the simplest most obvious observation:  No matter what you do with minimum WAGE, America will never have minimum COST.
Eliminate minimum wage and Coca Cola will pay $2/ day.  But a 20 oz. Sprite won't cost a penny less.
Keep minimum wage the same and Raceway will keep paying its employees the same amount, but Raceway is not going to keep gas prices at the same amount.  They aren't going to freeze the price of honey buns.
You can freeze or eliminate a minimum pay scale but it won't freeze minimum real estate prices or the prices of milk, bread, baby food, health care, or college.

And the 3rd Trick is to compare one aspect of 2 different situations while ignoring every other aspect of the comparison.

Opponents make the comparison between the competitiveness of American businesses and the businesses of nations without minimum wage.  I can't figure out why supporters don't just follow through on that comparison and talk about the lack of human rights, the abysmal poverty, the absence of what we consider basic services like sanitation and electricity, and the rampant governmental corruption that are endemic to "competitive" countries with little or no minimum wage policies.

People are supporting policies that give American billionaires the sweeter life of Chinese billionaires without thinking 2 more steps ahead to see that it means American citizens having the life of Chinese peasants.

Like I said, it's an ingenious strategy.  Gotta respect the skills of these conservative strategists.

 ---Anderson T. Graves II   is a writer, community organizer and consultant for education, ministry, and rural leadership development.

Rev. Anderson T. Graves II is pastor of Hall Memorial CME Church in Montgomery, Alabama, executive director of the Substance Abuse Youth Networking Organization (SAYNO) and director of rural leadership development for the National Institute for Human Development (NIHD).

Email atgravestwo2@aol.com
To hear sermons, read devotions, and learn more about the ministry at Hall Memorial CME Church, visit www.hallmemorialcme.blogspot.com .

If this message helps or touches you, please help support this ministry. Send a donation of any amount by check or money order.
Mail all contributions to :
Hall Memorial CME Church
541 Seibles Road


Montgomery, AL 36116

Monday, December 9, 2013

THE REST OF THE STORY (of the Virgin Birth)

I've read and heard some very eloquent and well-researched debates about the virgin or "virgin" birth of Jesus. The theological back-and-forth basically revolves around the translation that yields the English word "virgin" in Matthew 1 and Isaiah 7. 

Historically we took the word "virgin" to mean VIRGIN.  But theologians correctly point out that the original term could also mean simply "young woman," not necessarily a young woman who's never had sex.

This argument continues as though there's no authoritative source that clearly and definitively says whether or not Mary and Joseph had sex before Jesus was conceived. 

Oh, wait.   There is THE REST OF THE BIBLE.

Matthew 1: 24, 25 says: 24  Then Joseph, being aroused from sleep, did as the angel of the Lord commanded him and took to him his wife, 25 and DID NOT KNOW HER till she had brought forth her firstborn Son. And he called His name Jesus.  (The New King James Version)

The NIV says, that Joseph did not consummate their marriage until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.

The NRSV says, that Joseph had no marital relations with her until she had borne a son;and he named him Jesus.

So if you just keep reading you soon realize that the Bible clearly states that Mary did not have sex until after Jesus was born which means that MARY WAS A VIRIGN WHEN JESUS WAS CONCEIVED.

Now, what was it we were arguing about again?

Riiight. 

Nothing.

---Anderson T. Graves II   is a writer, community organizer and consultant for education, ministry, and rural leadership development.

Rev. Anderson T. Graves II is pastor of Hall Memorial CME Church in Montgomery, Alabama, executive director of the Substance Abuse Youth Networking Organization (SAYNO) and director of rural leadership development for the National Institute for Human Development (NIHD).


To hear sermons, read devotions, and learn more about the ministry at Hall Memorial CME Church, visit www.hallmemorialcme.blogspot.com .

You can read more on Pastor Graves's personal blog at www.andersontgraves.blogspot.com  .

If this message helps or touches you, please help support this ministry. Send a donation of any amount by check or money order.
Mail all contributions to :
Hall Memorial CME Church
541 Seibles Road
Montgomery, AL 36116